Position 5
Footbridge Media
71/100
The cheapest real option on this page by a distance, with no contract and a money-back window.
Wrong for: You are doing $20M and need someone to own a multi-location strategy. At $249 a month nobody is doing that.
Compare · published scores only · reviewed 12 September 2026
Footbridge publishes a $249 no-contract offer. Valve+Meter publishes stronger named HVAC case studies and fits a larger operator that needs a broader bench. Totals stay 71 and 65; this page does not change either score.
Position 5
71/100
The cheapest real option on this page by a distance, with no contract and a money-back window.
Wrong for: You are doing $20M and need someone to own a multi-location strategy. At $249 a month nobody is doing that.
Position 6
65/100
Case studies that name the company and show the arithmetic, including one where a mild winter held the whole market back and they said so.
Wrong for: Nothing about the commercial relationship is on the site. Price, term, notice and ownership are all a phone call away.
Each line below uses the same 0–5 criterion reads already shown on the agency profiles. The overall totals weight those criteria; this page only narrates the gaps so a buyer can see fit without pretending either score moved.
For the arithmetic behind the totals see how we rank. For neighbouring match-ups stay on the compare index below.
Footbridge publishes a $249 no-contract offer. Valve+Meter publishes stronger named HVAC case studies and fits a larger operator that needs a broader bench.
A higher total means the company publishes a stronger evidence record across the six criteria. It does not replace fit. Open both profiles before a call, then check the terms and sources against the agreement you are actually offered.
Footbridge Media ranks 5 with a published total of 71; Valve+Meter ranks 6 with 65. Both positions follow the same measured score order used on the leaderboard.
No. It restates differences already visible on each agency profile and the homepage leaderboard.
No. Use specialisation, contract terms and named client work to test fit. A higher total is a stronger published-disclosure reading, not a guaranteed ROI.